Relationship of axiology and innovatics in educational systems
https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-7219-2021-2-6-14
Abstract
Aim. The article deals with the relationship between axiology and innovation in educational systems. The traditions of the people, permeating the national culture, create the necessary framework, the core that keeps the entire system in a state of integrity and progressive development
Methodology. The analysis of the literature on the problems of axiology and innovation in education, the description of the experience of pedagogical research allowed us to draw both theoretical and practice-oriented conclusions.
Results. The analysis of the theoretical literature and the results of scientific research allowed us to understand the processes of creating pedagogical innovations, their development by the pedagogical community and their application, which objectively leads to the definition of the subject and tasks of pedagogical axiology. The key concepts that reflect the relationship between axiology and innovation are highlighted, such as the Internet value-semantic sphere, network personality, university youth subculture, creativity as a system-forming result of the educational process.
Research Implications. Theoretical significance of this study consists in the analysis of the relationship between axiology and innovation in education, the essential characteristic of which is to maintain the balance of the new and the old, which ensures the development of educational systems. The experience described in the article can be extrapolated into the practice of educational organizations.
About the Author
A. V. Kiryakova
Orenburg State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Aida V. Kiryakova – Dr. Sci. (Pedagogy), Prof., Head of the Department of General and Professional Pedagogy
13 Pobedy Avenue, Orenburg, 460018
References
1. Akhayan A. A. Obrazovatel’naya dinamika setevoi lichnosti [Educational dynamics of the network personality]. Saint Petersburg, 2018. 212 p.
2. Bagdasaryan V. E. [Axiology of Russia in the perspective of world development]. In: Politika i obshchestvo [Politics and society], 2014, no. 7, pp. 837–854.
3. Baeva L. V. Tsennosti izmenyayushchegosya mira: ekzistentsial’naya aksiologiya istorii [Values of a Changing World: Existential Axiology of History]. Moscow, Izd-vo AGU Publ., 2004. 277 p.
4. Barker J. Paradigmy myshleniya: Kak uvidet’ novoe i preuspet’ v menyayushchemsya mire [Thinking Paradigms: How to See New and Succeed in a Changing World]. Moscow, Al’pina Biznes Buks Publ., 2007. 187 p.
5. Veresaev N., Mel’nikov A. Obrazovanie i kul’tura: nereal’nye tseli i real’nye tsennosti [Education and culture: unrealistic goals and real values]. Available at: http://nveresov.narod.ru/OIK.pdf (accessed: 01.15.2021).
6. Bek D., Kovan K. [Spiral Dynamics: Managing Values, Leadership and Change in the 21st Century] (Russ. ed.: Freiman I., Mironov P., transl. Spiral’naya dinamika: upravlyaya tsennostyami, liderstvom i izmeneniyami [v XXI veke]. Saint Petersburg, 2010. 419 p.).
7. Kagan M. S. Filosofskaya teoriya tsennosti [Philosophical theory of value]. Saint Petersburg, Petropolis Publ., 1997. 205 p.
8. Kir’yakova A. V. Aksiologiya i innovatika universitetskogo obrazovaniya: monografiya [Axiology and Innovation of University Education]. Moscow, Dom pedagogiki Publ., 2010. 200 p.
9. Kir’yakova A. V., Moroz V. V. Aksiologiya kreativnosti [Axiology of creativity]. Moscow, Dom pedagogiki Publ., 2014. 225 p.
10. Kondakov A. M. FGOS starshei shkoly: problemy i perspektivy [Federal State Educational Standard of the High School: Problems and Prospects]. Available at: http://www.slideshare.net/DrofaUral/ss15751214 (accessed: 01.15.2021).
11. Mosienko L. V. Molodezhnaya subkul’tura: problema stanovleniya [Youth subculture: the problem of formation]. Moscow, Dom pedagogiki Publ., 2010. 205 p.
12. Robinson K. Obrazovanie protiv talanta [Education versus talent]. Moscow, Mann, Ivanov i Ferber Publ., Eksmo Publ., 2013. 336 p.
13. Fel’dshtein D. I. [Problems of psychological and pedagogical sciences in the space-time situation of the XXI century]. In: Vestnik sportivnoi nauki [Sports Science Bulletin], 2013, no. 4, pp. 3–11.
14. Tsibulnikova V. E. [Pedagogical analysis of the lesson in the system of value-oriented health-creating management of the teaching staff]. In: Teoriya i praktika fizicheskoi kul’tury [Theory and practice of physical culture], 2018, no. 3, pp. 33–35.
15. Tsibulnikova V. E., Khoptinskaya A. A. [Teacher's readiness for high-quality health-creating activities in the context of the implementation of the Federal State Educational Standard for Higher and General Education]. In: Sbornik izbrannykh statei po materialam nauchnykh konferentsii GNII «Natsrazvitie» [Collection of selected articles on the materials of scientific conferences of the State Research Institute “National Development”]. Saint Petersburg, GNII «Natsrazvitie» Publ., 2019, pp. 54–60.
16. Tsibulnikova V. E., Khoptinskaya A. A. [The quality of a health-preserving educational environment: levels of formation, indicators and assessment criteria]. In: Teoriya i praktika fizicheskoi kul’tury [Theory and practice of physical culture], 2020, no. 1, pp. 11–13.
17. Yuzhaninova E. R. Aksiosfera interneta i lichnost’ [Axiosphere of the Internet and Personality]. Moscow, Dom pedagogiki Publ., 2013, 274 p.
18. Lovat T., Toomey R., Clement N. International Research Handbook on Values Education and Student Wellbeing. London, New York, 2010. 336 p.
19. Hofstede G. Cultural Dimensions in Management and Planing. In: Gudykust W. B. , Young Yun, eds. Readings OnCommunicating with Strangers. McGraw-Hill, Inc., pp. 89–109.
Review
Views:
156
Email this article 