Personality-Creating Strategy Formed by Interaction of Pedagogical Teams of Educational Complexes with Students’ Families

Aim of the scientific article is to describe the main aspects of the personality-creating strategy of the effective interaction of educational complexes with students’ families who are aimed at achieving higher educational results.

Methodology. The study employed personcentered approaches. Surveys were conducted with parents, and pedagogical teams were interviewed to analyze the level of interaction within the educational complexes.

Results have demonstrated that implementing personality-creating strategy in interactions between educational institutions and students’ families enhances the level of parental engagement in the educational process. The study has established that personality-creating strategy improves communication between educators and students’ families and positively influences students’ academic performance and socialization. Analysis of the results indicated increased parental satisfaction with the educational process and greater active participation in school life. Scientific novelty and research implications. The scientific novelty resides in the description of the personality-creating strategy for educational complexes’ pedagogical teams to engage with students’ families, adapting innovative pedagogical approaches and psychological practices to contemporary circumstances. The theoretical significance of this research lies in broadening the understanding of the interaction between educational complexes and students’ families, commencing from preschool, which currently facilitates the development of modern models and innovative approaches in the relevant field. The practical significance of this research lies in utilizing the data obtained to enhance teacher-parent interaction programs for preschool and schoolage students. The results obtained can serve as a basis for developing methodological guidelines aimed at improving the interaction between the teaching staff and students’ families.

Conclusions. In the process of research, it was determined that the personality-creating strategy of interaction of educational complexes with students’ parents contributes to improving the communication process, which in this case has a positive effect on academic performance and socialization of students.

1. Anisimova, O. A. & Mitin, G. V. (2024). Psychological Resources and Information Technology Tools of a Teacher for Engaging Students in the Learning Process. In: Bulletin of Practical Psychology of Edu- cation, 21, 2-1, 69–77. DOI: 10.17759/bppe.2024210209 (in Russ.).

2. Asmolov, A. G. (2020). Guide to the School of Opportunities: Programming the Unprogrammable. In: Educational Policy, 83, 2, 6–7 (in Russ.).

3. Asmolov, A. G. (2021). Personalization of Education and Anthropology of the Future. In: Public Edu- cation, 3 (1486), 75–82 (in Russ.).

4. Bayborodova, L. V., Lebedeva, T. S. & Tarkhanova, I. Yu. (2017). Social and Pedagogical Support for Troubled Families. Moscow, Vlados publ. (in Russ.).

5. Bondarevskaya, E. V. (2000). Theory and Practice of Personality-Centered Education. Rostov-on-Don, Bulat publ. (in Russ.).

6. Volkova, T. V. & Mansarliyskaya, L. F. (2021). Partnership between Teachers as a Key to Successful Continuity of Preschool and School Education. In: Modern Preschool Education, 4. Available at: https:// sdo-practice.ru/journalpril (accessed 21.07.2025).

7. Gorlova, N. A. (2024). The Essence and Content of a Personality-Creating Strategy. In: Gorlova, N. A., ed. Zhuravlev Readings. Scientific and Pedagogical Foundations for Designing a Personality-Creating Education Strategy: Proceedings of the IX International Scientific and Practical Conference Held as Part of the IX International Science Festival (Moscow, February 13, 2024) Moscow, Federal State University of Education publ. (in Russ.).

8. Gorlova, N. A. (2020). Students’ Personality Development in the Educational Process as a Pedagogical Category. In: Pedagogy, 1, 35–42 (in Russ.).

9. Gorlova, N. A. (2021). Personality Pedagogy: Manual. Moscow, Rusains publ. (in Russ.).

10. Gracheva, A. P. (2014). Improving the Efficiency of Adaptive School Management Through the Use of Information Technologies. In: RUDN Journal of Informatization in Education, 1, 114–120 (in Russ.).

11. Zvereva, O. L. & Krotova, T. V. (2009). Communication between Teachers and Parents in Preschool Ed- ucational Institutions: Methodological Aspect. Moscow: EC Sphere publ. (in Russ.).

12. Makukha, T. D. & Anisimova, I. A. (2018). Family Club as a Model of Interaction between Preschool Educational Institutions and Families: Methodological Handbook for Teachers and Parents of Preschool Institutions. Armavir: AGPA publ. (in Russ.).

13. Moleva, T. A. (2014). School Family Club and the Problem of Forming Spiritual and Moral Values in Children and Parents. In: Man and Education, 1 (38), 69–74 (in Russ.).

14. Potasheva, I. I. & Ermakova, T. N. (2021). Development of Personal Potential of Subjects of the Educa- tional Process. In: Pedagogy and Psychology of Education, 3, 24–39. DOI: 10.31862/2500-297X-2021-3-24-39 (in Russ.).

15. Rezakova, A. A. (2023). Possibilities of Personal Self-Determination of Primary School Students through Constructing a Choice Situation. In: Azimuth of Scientific Research: Pedagogy and Psychology, 12, 1 (42), 104–108. DOI: 10.57145/27128474_2023_12_01_20 (in Russ.).

16. Serikov, V. V. (1994). Personality Oriented Approach in Education: Concepts of Technology. Volgograd, Peremena publ. (in Russ.).

17. Tikhomirova, E. I. (2020). Subjective Personal Development of Students as a Strategy for Humani- tarian Education. In: Vazhnik, S. A., ed. Actual Problems of Humanitarian Education: Materials of the VII International Scientific Practical Conference, Minsk, October 22–23, 2020. Minsk, Belarusian State University publ., 35–46 (in Russ.).

18. Khutorskoy, A. V. (2012). Meta-Subject Approach in Teaching: Scientific and Methodological Manual. Moscow: Eidos publ. (in Russ.).

19. Chistova, L. N. (2021). The Program of Interaction Between School and Family as a Tool for Devel- oping a Responsible Attitude of Younger Students towards Their Responsibilities. In: World of Science. Pedagogy and Psychology, 2. Available at: https://mir-nauki.com (accessed: 20.01.2025) (in Russ.).

20. Shumeiko, T. S. (2024). Person-Oriented Approach and Individually Differentiated Approaches in Education: Analysis of Methodological Aspects and Features of Practical Implementation. In: Bulletin of Psychology and Pedagogy of Altai State University, 6 (2), 97–108. Available at: https://bppasu.ru/article/ view (accessed: 20.01.2025) (in Russ.).

21. Yakimanskaya, I. S. (2013). Fundamentals of Person-Oriented Education. Moscow: Knowledge Labo- ratory publ. (in Russ.).

22. Yasvin, V. A. (2001). Educational Environment: From Modeling to Design. Moscow: Smysl publ. (in Russ.).

23. Agareva, L. A. (2024). Implementation of Personalized Approach in Modern School. In: International journal of Professional Science, 12 (1.1), 30–39.