IMPROVEMENT OF CONTROL OF STUDENTS’ KNOWLEDGE UNDERTHE CONDITIONS OF INTRODUCTION A POINT-RATING SYSTEM

Aim. To substantiate the effectiveness of applying the differentiated approach to the organization of students’ knowledge control, taking into account the results of psycho-diagnostic testing with the introduction of a point-rating system at a technical university. Methodology. The results of substantiation of students’ psychological test results are analyzed and summarized for rational use of the capabilities of each student in the formation of a package of control measures and their objective assessment. Results. A sequence of control measures for evaluating the knowledge gained by students is described. Scientific novelty lies in the development of a system for the formation of subgroups of students based on the results of testing the level of knowledge and individual psychodiagnostic characteristics. Research implications. The developed knowledge control system resulted in an increase in students’ self-esteem indicators that stimulates learning motivation, which helps to improve the quality and level of knowledge gained. Besides, it makes it possible to evaluate, modify and make the necessary adjustment in the learning process, taking into account the results of control measures.

quality of education, knowledge control, point-rating system, differentiated approach, graded approach, self-esteem, knowledge level, psycho-diagnostic testing

1. Герасименко В. В. Новые подходы в преподавании маркетинговых дисциплин на программе бакалавров: курс «Связь с общественностью» // Вестник Московского университета. Серия 6: Экономика. 2012. № 4. С. 96-103.

2. Дубовец И. А., Найн А. А. Методика формирования умений самостоятельной учебно-профессиональной деятельности студентов направления Рекламы и связей с общественностью // Вестник Южно-Уральского государственного университета. Серия: Образование. Педагогические науки. 2014. Т. 6. № 3. С. 48-53.

3. Жохова М. П., Краюшкин В. В., Краюшкин К. В. Учебный портал по теоретическим основам электротехники: опыт использования, выводы и рекомендации // Вестник Московского энергетического института. 2017. № 3. С. 109-115.

4. Педагогика / под ред. П. И. Пидкасистого. М., 1995. 292 с.

5. Райгородский Д. Я. Практическая психодиагностика. Методики и тесты. М., 2011. 664 с.

6. Романенко Н. М. Анализ способов контроля знаний современных студентов // Человеческий капитал. 2015. № 5. С. 104-106.

7. Самыловский А. И. Тест как объективный измерительный инструмент в образовании // Вопросы тестирования в образовании. 2001. № 1. С. 10-39.

8. Innovating Education and Educating for Innovation: The Power of Digital Technologies and Skills, OECD Publishing. Paris, 2016. 153 p.

9. Kozmina I., Maksimov R., Musorina O. The Use of Interactive Methods and Computer Technologies for Increasing the Motivation for In-Depth Study and Obtaining Long-Term Knowledge in the Course Theoretical Foundations of Electrical Engineering // The materials of the IV International Conference on Information Technologies in Engineering Education Inforino, 23-26 October. 2018. Moscow, 2018. pp. 1-5.

10. Sihvola P. Multidisciplinary Education - Impact on Working Career, Case IDBM // Aalto University School of Business, Department of Management Studies. 2014. 123 р.