Organization of work on errors in the written speech of Iranian students

Aim. To present a methodological system of work on the prevention and correction of errors in written speech of Iranian students studying Russian.

Methodology and methods. The analysis of scientific and methodological literature on the research topic was carried out. A comparative analysis of the forms, techniques and methods of teaching Iranian students the Russian language, including such a type of speech activity as writing, is carried out. In addition, the method of pedagogical observation of the educational process and the method of studying the products of students’ activities – generalization and interpretation of linguistic material (written works of Iranian students) have been applied.

Results. The classification of typical mistakes made by Iranian students in written essays in Russian is presented. A system of exercises has been developed aimed at a) preventing speech errors, b) correcting (editing and literary editing) mistakes made.

Research implications. The scientific novelty of the study lies in the fact that it substantiates the necessity and expediency of creating a methodological system for overcoming errors in writing in Russian by students with native Persian. The essence of the methodology lies in the fact that a special place in the process of developing the speech competence of foreign students is given to learning the lexical compatibility of words. The didactic material consists of words and word combinations with a high degree of use, the vocabulary is organized thematically and structured in a special way. The results of the study can be used by teachers in classroom classes in groups of Iranian students who speak Russian in the volume of the I certification level.

Conclusions. In groups of Iranian students, it is necessary to carry out systematic work on the prevention or correction of errors in written texts created in Russian in order to develop language and communicative competence. An effective form of work is the performance of exercises for the assimilation of the norms of lexical compatibility.

1. Akishina A. A., Tryapelnikov A. V. [Innovative pedagogical technologies in RFL: new educational texts]. In: Metodika prepodavaniya inostrannyh yazykov i RKI: tradicii i innovacii: sbornik materialov III Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-metodicheskoj onlajn-konferencii [Methods of teaching foreign languages and RFL: traditions and innovations: collection of materials of the III International scientific and methodological online conference]. Kursk, Kursk State Medical University, 2018, pp. 166–176.

2. Brazhnik L. M., Galiev L. M., Galiullin R. R. et al. [Ethnooriented methods of teaching Russian as a foreign language to Arabic-speaking students]. In: Vestnik pedagogicheskih innovacij [Journal of pedagogical innovations], 2023, no. 2 (70), pp. 113–123.

3. Golestan P. [Typology of mistakes in Russian writings of Iranian students]. In: Kazanskaya nauka [Kazan Science], 2013, no. 12, pp. 241–243.

4. Zhinkin N. I. Rech' kak provodnik informacii [Speech as a conductor of information]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1982. 159 p.

5. Kalashi Nahidekh. [The role of linguoculturology in teaching Russian in Iran (yesterday, today)]. In: Mezhdunarodnyj aspirantskij vestnik [International Postgraduate Bulletin], 2020, no. 2, pp. 18–22.

6. Kamelova S. I. [About the features of teaching Russian speech to Iranian students]. In: CCS&ES, 2018, no. 3, pp. 284–288.

7. Kunovski M. N., Novoselova N. V. [Features of adaptation of Iranian students to the Russian educational environment]. In: Pedagogical Journal, 2018, vol. 8, is. 3A, pp. 146–154.

8. Mamontov A. S., Boguslavskaya V. V., Budnik E. A. [The word as a unit of communication and generalization in the aspect of nationally oriented educational lexicography]. In: Russkij yazyk za rubezhom [Russian language abroad], 2020, no. 4 (281), pp. 74–80.

9. Nikiforova E. B., Tereshchenko T. M. [Typical lexical errors of foreign students: the ways of prevention]. In: Izvestiya Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta [Ivzestia of the Volgograd State Pedagogical University], 2019, no. 7 (140), pp. 40–44.

10. Problemy prepodavaniya russkogo yazyka kak inostrannogo v sovremennom vuze: tradicii, novacii i perspektivy [Problems of teaching Russian as a foreign language in a modern university: traditions, innovations and prospects]. In: Belyakov M. V., ed. Moscow, MGIMO-Universitet Publ., 2022. 358 p.

11. Reginina K. V., Tyurina G. P., Shirokova L. I. Ustojchivye slovosochetaniya russkogo yazyka [Stable phrases of the Russian language]. Moscow, Russkij yazyk Publ., 2018. 300 p.

12. Sokolova Yu. A. [Formation of socio-cultural adaptation of foreign students within the framework of the practice-oriented project “We are in Russia”]. In: Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta [Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin], 2019, no. 7 (204), pp. 130–139.

13. Havronina S. A., Mitrofanova O. D. [Ethnomethodics as one of the promising areas of teaching RFL]. In: Konstantinova L. A., ed. Uroki russkoj slovesnosti: sbornik nauchnyh trudov [Lessons in Russian literature: collection of scientific works]. Tula, Tula State University Publishing House, 2017, pp. 72– 73.

14. Byram M., Zarate G. The Sociocultural and Intercultural Dimension of Language Learning and Teaching. Strasbourg: Council of Europe, Council for Cultural Cooperation, 1997. 120 p.

15. Du Toit A., Khumalo S., Mapotse T. A. Teaching technology. OUP Higher Education Division. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2020. 584 p.

16. Kramsch C. The Cultural Component of Language Teaching. In: Multiculturalism and Language Learning. Language, Culture and Curriculum. Special Issue, 1995, no. 8 (2), pp. 83–92.

17. Meyer M. Developing Transcultural Competence: Case Studies of Advanced Language Learners. In: Madiating Languages and Cultures: Towards an Intercultural Theory of Foreing Language Education. Clevedon, Multilingual Matters Publ., 1991, pp. 136–158.