The Pedagogical Value of Anatomical Drawing for the Medical Education System

Aim. To conduct an overview and analytical study in the field of anatomical drawing and to identify the pedagogical value of anatomical drawing for the medical education system.

Methodology. The methodological basis of this review is a set of approaches that provide a comprehensive analysis of the problem. A systematic approach is used to consider anatomical drawing as an integral component of the didactic system of medical education. Within the framework of the competence approach, the role of drawing in the formation of universal and professional competencies of a future specialist is assessed. The activity-based approach serves as a theoretical basis for explaining the cognitive mechanisms of assimilation of anatomical knowledge in the process of their graphical reproduction. The historical and methodological approach is used for a retrospective analysis of the evolution of the didactic functions of anatomical drawing from the Renaissance to the present day. The methods of comparative analysis and scientific classification were used to systematize the scientific literature data on the research problem.

Results. As a result of the study of anatomical drawing, its didactic potential as a tool for conceptualizing topographic anatomy, developing three-dimensional spatial thinking and forming professional competencies among students is substantiated. The analysis of the results of randomized trials demonstrates a statistically significant improvement in the indicators of material assimilation (an increase of 11% in drawing groups) and a high level of student engagement (up to 80–92% of positive reviews). Special attention is paid to the neurocognitive mechanisms of kinesthetic learning, the inclusive potential of the method and the prospects for its integration with digital educational environments.

Research implications. The research contributes to the justification of the educational paradigm shift: from passive consumption of information to active cognition through drawing. The work integrates modern data from neuro0didactics (theory of embodied cognition) and cognitive psychology (“drawing effect”) into the context of higher medical education. As a result of the research, the historically established duality of anatomical drawing (art vs. art) has been reinterpreted. medicine) and based on current research (2023–2025), it has been proved that drawing is not an archaism, but an independent method of forming stable cognitive schemas and three-dimensional conceptualization, which was not previously systematically justified in relation to the digital generation of students. The results of the study have direct practical significance for the modernization of educational programs in medical universities.

Conclusions. As a result of the study, the following conclusions were obtained: 1. The high efficiency of drawing has been empirically confirmed: modern research (2023–2025) proves that drawing improves memorization of anatomy better than passive work with 3D models. 2. Developing key competencies: drawing is an effective tool for developing spatial thinking, forcing students to mentally rotate an object and analyze its shape. The student’s visual skills and their application while studying anatomy form the most complete picture of the human structure, effectively complementing theoretical training, methods of observation and palpation. 3. Psychological accessibility and inclusivity: the fear of drawing (the “psychological barrier”) is quickly overcome after 2–3 classes. The students who initially rated their skills as low show the greatest progress. Drawing also reduces anxiety and increases engagement (80–89% of participants approved). 4. Symbiosis with technology: digital technologies (VR, 3D atlases) do not replace drawing but complement it. The optimal model is the use of technology to access the material, and drawing – for its active cognitive processing. 5. Application at different levels of education: the method is effective not only in higher education institutions, but also in continuing education and educational projects (as an accessible and ethical way to promote knowledge).

1. Druzhinin, A. A. & Muratov, A. M. (2025). To the Problem of Anatomical Drawing as the Most Relevant in Academic Art Education. Teaching Methods and Practices in Moscow Art Universities. In: Academia, 3, 561–566. DOI: 10.37953/2079-0341-2025-3-1-561-566 (in Russ.).

2. Morozov, V. N., Morozova, E. N. & Solin, A. V. (2024). Review of 3D Anatomical Atlases in Teaching Human Anatomy. In: Contemporary Issues of Morphology. Smolensk: BGNU publ., p. 83–85 (in Russ.).

3. Nikolenko, V. N., Rizaeva, N. A., Oganesyan, M. V., Kudryashova, V. A., Bolotskaya, A. A. & Mayorova, M. A. (2020). Learning Tools in Teaching Human Anatomy. In: World of Science, Culture and Education, 4 (83), 251–254 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.24411/1991-5497-2020-00749.

4. Alsaid, B. & Bertrand, M. (2016). Students’ Memorization of Anatomy, Influence of Drawing. In: Morphologie, 100, 329, 2 (6). DOI: 10.1016/j.morpho.2015.11.001.

5. Backhouse, M., Fitzpatrick, M. & Hutchinson, J. et al. (2017). Improvements in Anatomy Knowledge When Utilizing a Novel Cyclical “Observe-Reflect-Draw-Edit-Repeat” Learning Process. In: Anatomical Sciences Education, 10, 1, 7 (22). DOI: 10.1002/ase.1616.

6. Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded Cognition. In: Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639.

7. Basset, C. A., Spatola, G. F. & Uzzo, M. L. et al. (2024). Evaluating the Effectiveness of Drawing as a Pedagogical Tool in Teaching Histology and Human Anatomy to Dental and Allied Health Sciences: A Three-Year Observational Study. In: Italian Journal of Anatomy and Embryology, 128 (1), 93–99. DOI: 10.36253/ijae-15212.

8. Beach, I. R., D'Agostino, E. N. & Thakrar, R. et al. (2023). Learning by Drawing and Modeling: Teaching Modalities for Spinal Anatomy in Medical Students. In: Anatomical Sciences Education, 16, 6, 1041–1045. DOI: 10.1002/ase.2313.

9. Carracelas, E. M., Marín, M. A. & Cascales, M. M. (2024). Drawing as a Learning Tool for Anatomy: Design and Implementation of a Method. In: Revista española de educación médica, 6 (2). URL: https://silice.es/publication (accesed: 21.10.2025). DOI: 10.6018/edumed.639031.

10. Cheung, H. C. K., Zhong, L. S. & Wall, S. et al. (2026). Exploring the Impact of Virtual Reality Anatomy Training on Preparing Biomedical Illustrators for Drawing Anatomical Structures. In: Anatomical Sciences Education, 19 (3), 385–396. DOI: 10.1002/ase.70150.

11. Finn, G. M. & McLachlan, J. C. (2010). A Qualitative Study of Student Responses to Body Painting. In: Anatomical Sciences Education, 3, 1, 33–38. DOI: 10.1002/ase.119.

12. Ghosh, S. (2016). Cadaveric Dissection as an Educational Tool for Anatomical Sciences in the 21st Century. In: Anatomical Sciences Education, 10, 3, 286–299. DOI: 10.1002/ase.1649.

13. Ghosh, S. K. (2014). Evolution of Illustrations in Anatomy: A Study from the Classical Period in Europe to Modern Times. In: Anatomical Sciences Education, 8, 2, 175–188. DOI: 10.1002/ase.1479.

14. Grannum, J., Siiman, L. & Tamm, A. L. (2024). Enhancing Spatial Thinking in Anatomy Education with Digital 3D Tools: A Systematic Literature Review of Comparative Studies. In: Conference: 2024 International Conference on Computer and Applications (ICCA). Cairo, Egypt: IEEE publ., pp. 1–13. DOI: 10.1109/ICCA62237.2024.10928113.

15. Hackett, M. & Proctor, M. (2016). Three-Dimensional Display Technologies for Anatomical Education: A Literature Review. In: Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25, 4, 641–654. DOI: 10.1007/s10956-016-9619-3.

16. Hernandez, J. E., Vasan, N., Huff, S. et al. Learning Styles/Preferences Among Medical Students: Kinesthetic Learner’s Multimodal Approach to Learning Anatomy. In: Medical Science Educator, 30 (4), 1633–1638. DOI: 10.1007/s40670-020-01049-1.

17. Horne, C. A., Hepworth, D. & Saunders, E. et al. (2024). Everyone Can Draw: An Inclusive and Transformative Activity for Conceptualization of Topographic Anatomy. In: Anatomical Sciences Education, 17 (5), 1080–1096. DOI: 10.1002/ase.2460.

18. Horne, C. A. & Keenan, I. D. (2024). Drawing on Model: A New Approach to Topographic Anatomy. In: Medical Education, 58 (3), 345–346. DOI: 10.1002/ase.2460.

19. Khot, Z., Quinlan, K. & Norman, G. R. et al. (2013). The Relative Effectiveness of Computer-based and Traditional Resources for Education in Anatomy. In: Anatomical Sciences Education, 6 (4), 211–215. DOI: 10.1002/ase.1355.

20. Langlois, J., Bellemare, C. & Toulouse, J. et al. (2020). Spatial Abilities Training in Anatomy Education: A Systematic Review. In: Anatomical Sciences Education, 13, 1, 71–79. DOI: 10.1002/ase.1873.

21. Lyon, P., Letschka, P. & Ainsworth, T. et al. (2013). An Exploratory Study of the Potential Learning Benefits for Medical Students in Collaborative Drawing: Creativity, Reflection and “Critical Looking”. In: BMC Medical Education, 13, 86. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-13-86.

22. Nayak, S. B. & Kodimajalu, S. (2010). Progressive Drawing: A Novel “Lid-Openeer” and “Monotony-breaker”. In: Anatomical Sciences Education, 3 (6), 326–329. DOI: 10.1002/ase.172.

23. Philp, J. & Smith, J. (2025). The Art and Craft of Anatomy: Engaging the Public Through Creative Methods. In: Anatomical Sciences Education, 18 (3), 345–359. DOI: 10.1002/ase.70025.

24. Poupard, M., Larrue, F. & Bertrand, M. et al. (2025). Enhancing Anatomy Learning Through Mixed Reality-Supported Drawing: Investigating Learning Performance, Cognitive Load, and Intrinsic Motivation. In: HAL Open Science. URL: https://osf.io/preprints/edarxiv/gzvcb_v1 (accessed 10.10.2025). DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35867.17441.

25. Reid, S. J., Shapiro, L. & Louw, G. (2018). How Haptics and Drawing Enhance the Learning of Anatomy. In: Anatomical Sciences Education, 12 (2), 164–172. DOI: 10.1002/ase.1807.

26. Shapiro, L. (2019). Embodied Cognition and Its Significance for Education. In: Theory and Research in Education, 17 (1), 19–39. DOI: 10.1177/1477878518822149.

27. Shapiro, L., Hobbs, E. & Keenan, I. D. (2019). Focused Multisensory Anatomy Observation and Drawing for Enhancing Social Learning and Three-dimensional Spatial Understanding. In: Anatomical Sciences Education, 13 (4), 488–503. DOI: 10.1002/ase.1929.

28. Wainman, B., Pukas, G. & Wolak, L. et al. (2020). The Critical Role of Stereopsis in Virtual and Mixed Reality Learning Environments. In: Anatomical Sciences Education, 13 (3), 401–412. DOI: 10.1002/ase.1928.

29. Whillis, J. (2001). Anatomical Illustration. In: Journal of Audiovisual Media in Medicine, 24 (2), 54–59. DOI: 10.1080/01405110120048977.