Mediative Model Forming Positive Educational Results by Students of Cadet School

Aim. The scientific article describes a mediation model for the successful achievement of educational results by students at a cadet school, implemented through innovative quantum technologies aimed at developing communicative-cognitive competence.

Methodology. The study is based on personal value, system-activity, and cultural-historical approaches. The study utilized statistical and comparative analysis methods, as well as a diagnostic method. The participants were students from the Petrozavodsk Presidential Cadet School.

Scientific novelty and research implications. For the first time a mediative model for the formation of successful educational results for students at a cadet school is proposed and described, which is distinguished by the innovative use of quantum technologies for the development of communication and cognitive competence. The theoretical significance of the study lies in the definition of the principles of the formation of successful achievement of educational results: awareness, self-regulation, positive thinking, the principle of mediation. The mediative model has theoretical significance and potential for practical application in the educational process to increase academic performance and study success in general.

Results. It is demonstrated that the implementation of a mediative model contributes to the successful achievement of educational results, has a positive impact on academic motivation, the development of self-regulation, and positive cognitive thinking.

Conclusions. The study confirmed the effectiveness of the mediative model of shaping the successful achievement of educational results and creating a favorable educational environment. The implementation of the mediative model made it possible to increase academic performance, educational motivation and form positive cognitive thinking of students. Further research may focus on the long-term effects of implementing a given model and adapting it to different educational areas.

1. Asmolov, A. G. (2021). Personalization of Education and the Anthropology of the Future. In: Public Education, 3 (1486), 75–82 (in Russ.).

2. Asmolov, A. G. (2020). Guide to the School of Possibilities: Programming the Unprogrammable. In: Educational Policy, 83, 2, 6–7 (in Russ.).

3. Volynkina, N. V. & Gorlova, N. A. (2023). Quantum Technology of Meaningful Reading: A Textbook for Students of the Master’s Program at Military Universities. Voronezh: Nauchnaya Kniga publ. (in Russ.).

4. Vygotsky L. S. (2022). Thinking and Speech. Moscow: AST publ. (in Russ.).

5. Gorlova, N. A. (2017). Methods of Teaching a Foreign Language. Moscow: Academy publ. (in Russ.).

6. Gorlova, N. A. (2024). Pedagogy of Personality: A Study Guide. Moscow: Rusains publ. (in Russ.).

7. Gorlova, N. A. (2013). The Semantic Sphere of a Modern Child as a Basis for Prevention, Correction, and Development. In: Special Education, 2, 19–32 (in Russ.).

8. Gorlova, N. A. (2024). The Essence and Content of a Personality-Creating Strategy. In: Gorlova, N. A., ed. Zhuravlev Readings. Scientific and Pedagogical Foundations for Designing a Personality-Creating Strategy in Education: Proceedings of the IX International Scientific and Practical Conference Held as Part of the IX International Science Festival (Moscow, February 13, 2024). Moscow: Federal State University of Education publ.

9. Gorlova, N. A. (2020). Universal Quantum Technologies for Developing Semantic Listening Comprehension in Primary School Students. In: Special Education, 1 (57), 17–39 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.26170/sp20-01-02.

10. Danilova, M. V. (2025). Life Guidelines as a Forming Resource for the System of Value Orientations of Modern High School Students. In: Pedagogical Review, 3 (61), 153–164. DOI: 10.23951/2307-6127-2025-3-153-164 (in Russ.).

11. Maisel, O. V. (2016). The Method of Developing Cognitive Potential of R. Feuerstein and R. Guzman. In: Clinical Psychology and Special Education, 5, 3, 130–144. DOI: 10.17759/psyclin.2016050309 (in Russ.).

12. Ponomareva, L. D. & Churilina, L. N. (2019). Text as a Didactic Dominant of the Modern System of Speech-Creative Development of Students: An Interpretive Aspect. In: Prospects of Science and Education, 1 (37), 365–379. DOI: 10.32744/pse.2019.1.27 (in Russ.).

13. Mamaeva, E. A., Lyapunov, D. Yu., Shilova, Z. Yu. & Shadrina, N. N. (2025). Development of Critical Thinking of Future Teachers When Working with Generative Content Services. In: Perspectives of Science and Education, 5, 681–694 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.32744/pse.2025.5.44.

14. Serikov, V. V. (1994). A Personally Centered Approach to Education: Concepts of Technology. Volgograd: Peremena publ. (in Russ.).

15. Synthesis of Pedagogy and Psychology is a Breakthrough in Education. Recommendations of an Outstanding Psychologist to Help Children’s Teachers (Based on the Works of L. Vygotsky) (2022). Moscow: Amrita-Rus publ.: Shalva Amonashvili publ. (in Russ.).

16. Smirnova, T. A. & Fomin, A. E. (2023). A Methodology for Assessing the Metacognitive Experience of Adolescents in Academic and Non-Academic Activities: Design and Testing. In: World of Science. Pedagogy and Psychology, 11, 2. URL: https://mir-nauki.com (accessed: 10.10.2025).

17. Teplova, S. A. & Gorlova, N. A. (2024). Effective Technologies for Developing Meaningful Reading Skills in Basic General Education Students. In: Perspectives of Science and Education, 4 (70), 350–365 (in Russ.).

18. Chekkueva, Z. N. (2004). Speech Aggression of a Teacher as a Destructive Factor in Interpersonal Interaction in the Teacher-student System: [dissertation]. Stavropol (in Russ.).

19. Adler, A. & Seligman, M. E. R. (2018). Positive Education: Positive Psychology and Classroom Interventions. New York: Sustainable Development Solutions Network. DOI: 10.1080/03054980902934563.