mpjournalМосковский педагогический журналMoscow Pedagogical Journal2949-49902949-4974Federal State University of Educationmpjournal-818Research ArticleОБЩАЯ ПЕДАГОГИКААльтернативные системы оценки качества образования высшей школы СШАALTERNATIVE SYSTEMS OF THE QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF THE US HIGHER EDUCATIONВарламоваАлла ИгоревнаVarlamovaA. .VarlamovaAlla@yandex.ruФинансовый университет при Правительстве Российской ФедерацииРоссияFinancial University of the Government of the Russian FederationRussian Federation201330052022012227Copyright © Варламова А.И., 20222022Варламова А.И.Varlamova A...Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.mpjournal.ru/jour/article/view/818

Становление и развитие систем оценки качества образования в условиях современного общества является одной из актуальных тем в образовательном процессе. В статье представлены результаты исследования альтернативных систем оценки качества образования в высшей школе США в конце XX - начале XXI вв. Альтернативные системы противопоставляются традиционным на том основании, что позволяют оценить качество не в конце обучения, а в процессе становления специалиста. Автор обращается к работам американских исследователей, рассматривая образовательную систему США, так как в указанный период она добилась значительных успехов в деле повышения качества подготовки специалистов. Опыт решения этой проблемы в высшей школе США рассмотрен на трех уровнях - учебного заведения в целом, учебной программы и учебного курса. Рассмотрены критерии оценки, которые могут представлять как самостоятельный исследовательский интерес, так и в связи с процессом модернизации отечественной системы высшего профессионального образования.

The formation and development of quality assessment systems on modern society has become a topical issue for education. The article presents the results of studying some alternative systems of education quality assessment in the US higher education system in the end of the XXth - beginning of XXIst cc. The basis for contrasting the alternative systems with the traditional ones is that they assess the quality of education not in the end of the educational process but in progress. The author refers to some American researchers’ works and studies the US higher education system as it was this system where great progress has been made in improving the quality of human resource development. The author examines the experience of solving this problem on three levels of the US higher education system: the level of an educational institution, the level of a curriculum and the level of the course of study. The article presents the criteria of assessment which can be interesting both for scientific research and for the process of modernization of the system of higher education in Russia.

система высшего образованияоценка качества образованияальтернативные системыповышение качества подготовки специалистовhigher education systemassessment of education qualityalternative systemsimprovement of the quality of human resource developmentReferencesAlkin M.C. Evaluation essentials: From A to Z. - The Guilford Press. 2011. - 260 р.Alkin M.C. Evaluation essentials: From A to Z. - The Guilford Press. 2011. - 260 р.Angelo T.A., Cross K.P. Classroom assessment techniques: A handbook for college teachers (2nd ed.). San Francisco : Jossey-Bass, 1993. - 29 р.Angelo T.A., Cross K.P. Classroom assessment techniques: A handbook for college teachers (2nd ed.). San Francisco : Jossey-Bass, 1993. - 29 р.Bastick T. Relationships between in-course alignment indicators and post-course criteria of quality teaching and learning in higher education. Paper presented at the Biennial Meeting of the European Association for Research in Learning and Instruction, Fribourg, Switzerland, 2001. - 98 р.Bastick T. Relationships between in-course alignment indicators and post-course criteria of quality teaching and learning in higher education. Paper presented at the Biennial Meeting of the European Association for Research in Learning and Instruction, Fribourg, Switzerland, 2001. - 98 р.Barell J. Teaching for thoughtfulness: classroom strategies to enhance intellectual development. New Jersey: Longman Publishers. 1995. - 96 р.Barell J. Teaching for thoughtfulness: classroom strategies to enhance intellectual development. New Jersey: Longman Publishers. 1995. - 96 р.Charles Secolsky, D. Brian Denison. Handbook on Measurement, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. - Routledge, 2012. - 704 р.Charles Secolsky, D. Brian Denison. Handbook on Measurement, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. - Routledge, 2012. - 704 р.Conrad C.F., Kwako J., Gislason T. Exploration of the major types of assessment. Unpublished Manuscript, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 2003. - 34 р.Conrad C.F., Kwako J., Gislason T. Exploration of the major types of assessment. Unpublished Manuscript, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 2003. - 34 р.Cross K.P. Classroom research: Implementing the scholarship of teaching. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 1996. - 60(4). - 402-07. - 63 р.Cross K.P. Classroom research: Implementing the scholarship of teaching. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 1996. - 60(4). - 402-07. - 63 р.Haworth J.G., Conrad C.F. Emblems of quality in higher education: Developing and sustaining high-quality programs. Needham Heights. - MA: Allyn & Bacon, 1997 - 156 р.Haworth J.G., Conrad C.F. Emblems of quality in higher education: Developing and sustaining high-quality programs. Needham Heights. - MA: Allyn & Bacon, 1997 - 156 р.Huba M.E., Freed J.E. Learner-centered assessment on college campuses. Needham Heights. - MA: Allyn and Bacon, 2000. - 66 р.Huba M.E., Freed J.E. Learner-centered assessment on college campuses. Needham Heights. - MA: Allyn and Bacon, 2000. - 66 р.National Survey of Student Engagement. Improving the college experience: National benchmarks of effective educational practice. NSSE 2001 Report. - Bloomington: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research and Planning, 2001. - 26 р.National Survey of Student Engagement. Improving the college experience: National benchmarks of effective educational practice. NSSE 2001 Report. - Bloomington: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research and Planning, 2001. - 26 р.Palaskas T.A. Model for selecting technology mediated teaching strategies. Educational Technology, 2002. - 42(6). - Pр. 49-54. - 79 р.Palaskas T.A. Model for selecting technology mediated teaching strategies. Educational Technology, 2002. - 42(6). - Pр. 49-54. - 79 р.Shaun R. Harper, Jerlando F.L. Jackson. Introduction to American Higher Education. - Routledge, 2010. - 496 р.Shaun R. Harper, Jerlando F.L. Jackson. Introduction to American Higher Education. - Routledge, 2010. - 496 р.Smith R.A. Formative evaluation and the scholarship of teaching and learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning. - 2001. - 88. - Рp. 51-62 - 97 р.Smith R.A. Formative evaluation and the scholarship of teaching and learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning. - 2001. - 88. - Рp. 51-62 - 97 р.Whitehurst Grover J. Testimony presented to the Secretary of Education’s Commission on the Future of Higher Education. Dec. 8, 2005. - 155 р.Whitehurst Grover J. Testimony presented to the Secretary of Education’s Commission on the Future of Higher Education. Dec. 8, 2005. - 155 р.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.